From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthews v. Schusheim

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 7, 1974
35 N.Y.2d 686 (N.Y. 1974)

Summary

finding that plaintiff has "failed to prove" but for causation

Summary of this case from Lateral Recovery, LLC v. Capital Merch. Servs.

Opinion

Argued September 9, 1974

Decided October 7, 1974

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOSEPH A. SUOZZI, J.

Arthur A. Anderman for appellant.

Jacob D. Fuchsberg and Irving Lemov for respondents.



Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN, STEVENS and WITMER.

Designated pursuant to section 2 of article VI of the State Constitution.


Summaries of

Matthews v. Schusheim

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 7, 1974
35 N.Y.2d 686 (N.Y. 1974)

finding that plaintiff has "failed to prove" but for causation

Summary of this case from Lateral Recovery, LLC v. Capital Merch. Servs.
Case details for

Matthews v. Schusheim

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHEA K. MATTHEWS, Appellant, v. JOSEPH SCHUSHEIM et al., Respondents…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 7, 1974

Citations

35 N.Y.2d 686 (N.Y. 1974)
361 N.Y.S.2d 160
319 N.E.2d 422

Citing Cases

Satler v. Merlis

It is well established that a cause of action alleging fraud may not be based on disappointment that a…

Sanseri v. Sanseri

The rationale may have been based, in part, on the-then-current version of the Domestic Relations Law, which…