From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gelfand v. Adjo Contracting Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 15, 2011
82 A.D.3d 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2009-09638.

March 15, 2011.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Town of Hempstead appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered October 5, 2009, which, upon two decisions of the same court entered January 23, 2009, and June 26, 2009, respectively, made after a bifurcated nonjury trial on the issues of liability and damages, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against it in the principal sum of $625,000.

Rivkin Radler, LLP, Uniondale, N.Y. (Merril S. Biscone of counsel), for appellant. Elovich Adell, Long Beach, N.Y. (A. Trudy Adell, Mitchell Sommer, and Darryn Solotoff of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

In reviewing the Supreme Court's determination, made after a nonjury trial, our authority "is as broad as that of the trial court" and we "may render the judgment . . . warranted by the facts, taking into account in a close case the fact that the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses" ( Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [internal quotation marks omitted]). We discern no basis to disturb the Supreme Court's determination that the appellant was not entitled to prior written notice because the appellant created the dangerous condition that caused the injured plaintiffs accident through an affirmative act of negligence ( see Magidenko v Consolidated Edison, 3 AD3d 553, 554; Maggio v City of New York, 305 AD2d 554, 555; Akley v demons, 237 AD2d 780, 781-782; Parks v Hutchins, 162 AD2d 666; see also Tumminia v Cruz Constr. Corp., 41 AD3d 585; Perrington v City of Mount Vernon, 37 AD3d 571, 572; Padula v City of Long Beach, 20 AD3d 555; see generally Amabile v City of Buffalo, 93 NY2d 471, 474; Kiernan v Thompson, 73 NY2d 840, 842).

The appellant's remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

Gelfand v. Adjo Contracting Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 15, 2011
82 A.D.3d 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Gelfand v. Adjo Contracting Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW GELFAND et al., Respondents, v. ADJO CONTRACTING CORP. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 15, 2011

Citations

82 A.D.3d 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 1972
918 N.Y.S.2d 730

Citing Cases

Smith v. Town of Brookhaven

The Court of Appeals has recognized only two exceptions to the statutory prior written notice requirement,…

Garretson v. Town of Islip

Moreover, at her deposition, plaintiff testified that she was unaware of any complaints having been made…