From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Zimmerman v. Akron Falls Park

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 18, 1971
29 N.Y.2d 815 (N.Y. 1971)

Summary

In Zimmerman, as described earlier, the claimant received an SLU award for 80% use of his left arm for a left forearm amputation caused by a workplace accident in 1924.

Summary of this case from Johnson v. City of N.Y.

Opinion

Argued October 14, 1971

Decided November 18, 1971

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Julius Fell, Ruth Kessler Toch and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, appellant.

Howard Zimmerman, claimant, pro se. Marvin H. Mason for County of Erie, respondent.

James P. Lynch and George Cholet for Special Disability Fund, respondent.


Order reversed, with costs against the respondents employer and Fund, and the decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board reinstated in a memorandum: There was substantial medical evidence that claimant suffered a 50% loss of use of his arm attributable solely to the 1967 accident, and this the board properly found, "in view of the restricted motion of the left shoulder and in spite of the prior left forearm amputation". Thus, as the dissenters at the Appellate Division correctly concluded: "The record clearly indicates that the award made to claimant was limited only to the injury caused by the 1967 accident. Claimant's 1924 accident did not affect his left shoulder which was injured in the 1967 accident causing the 50% loss of use of the left arm." (See Workmen's Compensation Law, § 15, subd. 7.)

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, BERGAN, BREITAL and GIBSON. Judges SCILEPPI and JASEN dissent and vote to affirm on the opinion at the Appellate Division.


Summaries of

Matter of Zimmerman v. Akron Falls Park

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 18, 1971
29 N.Y.2d 815 (N.Y. 1971)

In Zimmerman, as described earlier, the claimant received an SLU award for 80% use of his left arm for a left forearm amputation caused by a workplace accident in 1924.

Summary of this case from Johnson v. City of N.Y.

In Zimmerman, the claimant received separate SLU awards for a 1924 amputation of his hand, and a 1967 injury to his arm, specifically the shoulder (Zimmerman, 35 A.D.2d 1030, 1030, 316 N.Y.S.2d 386 [3d Dept. 1970]).

Summary of this case from Johnson v. City of N.Y.

In Zimmerman, the claimant sustained an injury in 1924 that resulted in a "left forearm amputation" for which he had received an SLU award for 80% loss of use of the left arm (29 N.Y.2d at 819, 327 N.Y.S.2d 652, 277 N.E.2d 668).

Summary of this case from Johnson v. City of N.Y.
Case details for

Matter of Zimmerman v. Akron Falls Park

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of HOWARD ZIMMERMAN, Claimant, v. AKRON FALLS…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 18, 1971

Citations

29 N.Y.2d 815 (N.Y. 1971)
327 N.Y.S.2d 652
277 N.E.2d 668

Citing Cases

Johnson v. City of N.Y.

That contention cannot be reconciled with either the express language on which they rely or with the…

Johnson v. City of New York

That contention cannot be reconciled with either the express language on which they rely or with the…