Opinion
October 25, 1990
Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.
The record reveals that there was no compelling reason for claimant and her husband to move to Maryland but that it was done simply because he had retired and desired to live there. There was also no evidence that claimant could no longer afford to live in the area where she had been employed (see, Matter of Palmieri [Catherwood], 33 A.D.2d 588). Therefore, the determination that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Steed [Roberts], 115 A.D.2d 166).
Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Casey, Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.