From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Woodcock v. Walker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 10, 1915
170 App. Div. 4 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Summary

In Matter of Woodcock v. Walker (170 App. Div. 4), decided this term, we are holding that the allowance to an infant child is payable to the widow, and in the opinion it is stated: "It does not seem probable that it was the intention of the Legislature to require the appointment of a general guardian with an attendant expense in order to enable the children to collect the amounts allotted to them under the act."

Summary of this case from Matter of Dearborn v. Peugeot Auto Import Co.

Opinion

November 10, 1915.

Bertrand L. Pettigrew [ Walter L. Glenney of counsel], for the employer.

Jeremiah F. Connor, for the Workmen's Compensation Commission.

Egburt E. Woodbury, Attorney-General [ Harold J. Hinman, Deputy Attorney-General], for the Workmen's Compensation Commission.


The employer and insurance carrier stand neutral upon this question. All parties simply desire an interpretation of the law, that it may be determined to whom the moneys allotted to the infant children of the deceased shall be paid. Section 16 of the Workmen's Compensation Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 67 [Laws of 1914, chap. 41], as amd. by Laws of 1914, chap. 316) provides that "If the injury causes death, the compensation shall be known as a death benefit and shall be payable in the amount and to or for the benefit of the persons following: * * *

"2. If there be a surviving wife * * * thirty per centum of the average wages of the deceased during widowhood * * *; and if there be surviving child or children of the deceased under the age of eighteen years, the additional amount of ten per centum of such wages for each such child until of the age of eighteen years."

This provision of the statute would seem to authorize the payment to the wife not only of her thirty per cent, but of the additional amount which is allotted for the support of the several children. This conclusion is supported by the provision of section 20 of the Workmen's Compensation Law (as amd. by Laws of 1915, chap. 167), which authorizes the wife as the principal dependent to make an agreement with the employer, subject to the approval of the Commission, as to the payment of the award both to herself and for her children. There is no other provision in the act as to the payment of the award to infant children, and it does not seem probable that it was the intention of the Legislature to require the appointment of a general guardian with an attendant expense in order to enable the children to collect the amounts allotted to them under the act. Under the Domestic Relations Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 14 [Laws of 1909, chap. 19], § 80), in regard to real estate, if there be no general guardian the mother is the general guardian of the infants. This law by analogy tends to support the construction thus given.

All concurred.

Question certified answered in the affirmative.


Summaries of

Matter of Woodcock v. Walker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 10, 1915
170 App. Div. 4 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

In Matter of Woodcock v. Walker (170 App. Div. 4), decided this term, we are holding that the allowance to an infant child is payable to the widow, and in the opinion it is stated: "It does not seem probable that it was the intention of the Legislature to require the appointment of a general guardian with an attendant expense in order to enable the children to collect the amounts allotted to them under the act."

Summary of this case from Matter of Dearborn v. Peugeot Auto Import Co.
Case details for

Matter of Woodcock v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:Before STATE WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION COMMISSION. In the Matter of the Claim…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1915

Citations

170 App. Div. 4 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
155 N.Y.S. 702

Citing Cases

United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Cruce

" Cited in support thereof are the cases of Menominee Bay Shore Lumber Co. v. Industrial Commission, 162 Wis.…

State v. Morgan

Green v. State, 112 Ga. 52. Imprisonment of the putative father for failure to obey an order of maintenance,…