Opinion
May, 1917.
Award affirmed, on the authority of Dale v. Hual Construction Co. ( 175 App. Div. 284); Matter of Dale v. Saunders Bros. ( 218 N.Y. 59); Hartell v. Simonson Son Co. (Id. 345). All concurred, except Woodward, J., who dissented.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Matter of Wood v. Tupper Lake Chemical Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1917
178 App. Div. 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)
Summaries of
Matter of Wood v. Tupper Lake Chemical Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1917
178 App. Div. 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)
Case details for
Matter of Wood v. Tupper Lake Chemical Company
Case Details
Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ROSANNA WOOD, for Compensation, v. TUPPER…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: May 1, 1917
Citations
178 App. Div. 942 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)
Citing Cases
Peck v. Tassell Fairbanks
That claimant's husband was not an independent contractor seems clear from the evidence and finds support in…