From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Wong v. Chetta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 2000
271 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

April 3, 2000.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to "vacate and set aside" an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County , dated May 26, 1999, in a criminal action entitled People v. Wong, pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under S.C.I. No. 11208/91, and application for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person. Cross motion by the respondent Philip J. Chetta to dismiss the proceeding.

Willie Wong, a/k/a Willie Andrews, a/k/a William Andrews, a/k/a William Anderson, Malone N.Y., petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Lisa Ghartey Ogundimu of counsel), for respondents.

WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, J.P., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION, ORDER, JUDGMENT

ORDERED that the application for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person is granted; and it is further ,

ORDERED that the cross motion to dismiss is granted; and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

A proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 is not the appropriate method to seek review of issues that could be raised on direct appeal, and therefore, this proceeding must be dismissed (see,Matter of Tyler v. Forma, 231 A.D.2d 891 ; Matter of Sans v. Doyle, 175 A.D.2d 670). In any event, this proceeding is untimely (see,CPLR 217).


Summaries of

Matter of Wong v. Chetta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 2000
271 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Wong v. Chetta

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF WILLIE WONG, a/k/a WILLIE ANDREWS, a/k/a WILLIAM ANDREWS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 3, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 838

Citing Cases

Rappaport v. Riordan

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. A CPLR article 78 proceeding may not be used to seek…

Aarismaa v. Bender

Petitioner's contentions in this proceeding all involve challenges to an October 2011 judgment and decree…