From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Winkelman v. Furey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 16, 2000
273 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

June 16, 2000.

Appeal from Order of Niagara County Family Court, DiFlorio, J.H.O. — Custody.

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., WISNER, KEHOE AND LAWTON, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court did not abuse its discretion in awarding custody of the child to respondent mother. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the court properly weighed the appropriate factors affecting the best interests of the child ( see, Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 171-174). The court was "in the best position to evaluate the character and credibility of the witnesses" ( Matter of Paul C. v. Tracy C., 209 A.D.2d 955, 956). "Its determination has a sound and substantial basis in the record and should not be disturbed" ( Matter of Bronson v. Bronson, 254 A.D.2d 737).


Summaries of

Matter of Winkelman v. Furey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 16, 2000
273 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Winkelman v. Furey

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF JEFFREY M. WINKELMAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. KELLY A. FUREY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
710 N.Y.S.2d 277

Citing Cases

Matter of Heintz v. Heintz

The record does not support the contention of petitioner that he was prejudiced by the temporary order, which…