From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Weinstein v. Motor Veh. Acc. Indem

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 11, 1968
30 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

June 11, 1968


Order, entered December 12, 1967, granting leave to respondent to sue appellant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to abide the event, and the matter remanded to Special Term for a hearing. Upon the affidavits presented on the application the court is in no position to evaluate the situation and satisfactorily determine whether in compliance with the statutory mandate a proper report of the "hit-and-run" accident had in fact been made to the police or to a peace officer. (Insurance Law, § 608, subd. [b]; § 618; Matter of Malitz v. MVAIC, 17 A.D.2d 108.)

Concur — Botein, P.J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Weinstein v. Motor Veh. Acc. Indem

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 11, 1968
30 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Matter of Weinstein v. Motor Veh. Acc. Indem

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of BERNARD WEINSTEIN, Respondent, v. MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 11, 1968

Citations

30 A.D.2d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Gorson v. Ætna Accident & Liability Co.

Harry Shapiro, for appellant, cited: Schwartz v. Surety Co., 113 N.Y. Sup. 66; Leiman v. Surety Co., 111 N.Y.…