From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Weeks

Supreme Court, New York County
Aug 29, 1934
153 Misc. 211 (N.Y. Misc. 1934)

Opinion

August 29, 1934.

McKercher Link [ George Link, Jr., of counsel], for Hathaway Manufacturing Company.

Weil, Gotshal Manges [ Sylvan Gotshal and Gabriel Kaslow of counsel], for Weeks, Sawyer Co.


Motion to confirm the award of arbitrators. The arbitrators found in favor of the defendant, but made no finding respecting costs or disbursements. The court lacks any power to impose such costs, and the result is that neither party can look to the other for reimbursement of any moneys paid out, no matter how necessary to the proceeding. ( New York Lumber Wood-Working Co. v. Schnieder, 119 N.Y. 475.) Defendant relies on section 1461 of the Civil Practice Act. This section refers solely to costs and disbursements on the motion to confirm the award and proceedings subsequent thereto. The third arbitrator was appointed by the court, and the findings include a request to fix his fee. He suggests $500, and neither party objects to the amount nor to its being fixed on this motion. Accordingly, it is fixed at $500. In the absence of direction by the arbitrators, this fee is to be paid equally by the parties, as both are responsible for it. (See Atterbury v. Trustees of Columbia College, 66 Misc. 273.)

Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Matter of Weeks

Supreme Court, New York County
Aug 29, 1934
153 Misc. 211 (N.Y. Misc. 1934)
Case details for

Matter of Weeks

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EDWARD A. WEEKS and Others

Court:Supreme Court, New York County

Date published: Aug 29, 1934

Citations

153 Misc. 211 (N.Y. Misc. 1934)
273 N.Y.S. 922

Citing Cases

Cecil v. Bank of America

In Lief v. Brodsky, 126 N.Y.S.2d 657, it was held that the court had no power to allow costs and…

UNEEDA-HEMPSTEAD, v. BILT WELL CONTRACTING

The defendant, however, claims that inasmuch as his arbitration agreement contained this wording: "That a…