From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Walters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 12, 1994
206 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

July 12, 1994


Respondent's misconduct consisted of, inter alia, failure to file an attorney registration statement, failure to comply with a court order, and failure to cooperate with petitioner in its investigation (see, Matter of Walters, supra). In explanation and mitigation of her misconduct, respondent now points to several personal circumstances which occurred during the relevant time period, including problems with her former law firm, family problems, and a potentially serious medical condition. Respondent also notes that she has engaged in substantial pro bono law guardian and assigned counsel work. In addition, she submits several laudatory character affidavits and letters from fellow Columbia County attorneys and others.

In view of the mitigating circumstances now presented, which offer some explanation for but do not excuse respondent's professional misconduct, we grant her motion to the extent of considering such circumstances and reducing the sanction previously imposed from disbarment to a six-month suspension. Respondent's reinstatement to practice will be conditioned upon her submission of medical opinion that she has the mental and emotional capacity to resume the practice of law and upon her payment of the stenographic fees and all attorney registration fees due and owing (see, e.g., Matter of Farley, 205 A.D.2d 874; Matter of Kent, 182 A.D.2d 157; Matter of Relyea, 175 A.D.2d 949).

Cardone, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Weiss, and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent's motion is granted to the extent of considering the mitigationg circumstances presented and reducing the prior sanction imposed from disbarment to a six-month suspension effective, nunc pro tunc, as of May 11, 1994; and it is further ordered that respondent's reinstatement to practice be and hereby is conditioned upon her submission of medical opinion that she has the mental and emotional capacity to resume the practice of law and upon her payment of the stenographic fees and all attorney registration fees due and owing; and it is further ordered that respondent be and hereby is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as an agent, clerk or employee of another; and she hereby is forbidden to appear as attorney and counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or of any advice in relation thereto; and it is further ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of section 806.9 of the rules of this Court ( 22 NYCRR 806.9) regulating the conduct of disbarred, suspended or resigned attorneys.


Summaries of

Matter of Walters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 12, 1994
206 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Walters

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of AUDREY S. WALTERS, an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1994

Citations

206 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 81

Citing Cases

Matter of Walters

Respondent has not replied to the motion. We grant the motion, find respondent guilty of the charges of…

Matter of Wheatley

In view of the mitigating circumstances now presented, we further grant respondent's motion to the extent of…