From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vere C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 7, 1992
183 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

May 7, 1992

Appeal from the Family Court, Bronx County, Rhoda J. Cohen, J.


Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and giving it the benefit of every reasonable doubt (People v. Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, cert denied 469 U.S. 932), we find that the evidence was sufficient as a matter of law to support the court's fact finding determination. In light of the evidence that the 12-year old victim was accosted by appellant and another individual, struck with a gun and further threatened, and that the second individual proceeded to go through the victim's pockets, there was sufficient evidence to demonstrate the intent to deprive the victim of his property (Matter of Andrew S., 177 A.D.2d 428).

Concur — Carro, J.P., Milonas, Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

In re Vere C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 7, 1992
183 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

In re Vere C.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of VERE C., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 7, 1992

Citations

183 A.D.2d 428 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
583 N.Y.S.2d 376

Citing Cases

People v. Harris

A short while later, the defendant demanded the boy's keys and proceeded to go through his pockets. This was…

People v. Cordero

There is no basis for disturbing the jury's credibility determinations. The jury reasonably believed that…