From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Vecchia v. Town of North Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 22, 1994
207 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

August 22, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Town's position that a public employer may abolish a civil service position for the purpose of economy or efficiency as long as the position is not abolished as a subterfuge to avoid statutory protection afforded civil servants before they are discharged (see, Matter of Aldazabal v. Carey, 44 N.Y.2d 787; Matter of Bianco v. Pitts, 200 A.D.2d 741). Here, the Supreme Court correctly determined that the petitioner failed to sustain his burden of proving that his position was abolished in bad faith (see, Matter of O'Donnell v. Kirby, 112 A.D.2d 936).

We have examined the petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Balletta, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Vecchia v. Town of North Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 22, 1994
207 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Vecchia v. Town of North Hempstead

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GARY DELLA VECCHIA, Appellant, v. TOWN OF NORTH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 22, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 484 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 56

Citing Cases

Jodre v. Locust Val. Cent. School Dist.

Upon the papers submitted, the petition should be denied and the proceeding dismissed on the merits. A public…

Matter of Rose v. City of Newburgh

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. It is well established that a public employer may abolish…