From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Vaccaro v. Lawley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 15, 1967
28 A.D.2d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

June 15, 1967

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Henry and Del Vecchio, JJ.


(Order entered June 13, 1967.) Order unanimously affirmed insofar as it restores and reinstates, as valid, the nominating petitions of delegates and alternates from the 146th Assembly District; determination of Board of Elections annulled as to said Assembly District; otherwise order reversed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner purports to maintain this proceeding "individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated." He contends that this brings before the court all of the candidates for delegates and alternates to the 8th Judicial District Convention from Assembly Districts located wholly within Erie County. This contention is incorrect. Representative actions under section 330 of the Election Law may be maintained on behalf of candidates in the district of petitioner. They may not be maintained on behalf of candidates in election districts other than petitioner's own. ( Matter of Pearson v. Board of Elections, 284 App. Div. 649; Matter of Cantwell v. Cohen, 259 App. Div. 742; Matter of Enright v. Board of Elections, 257 App. Div. 601, appeal dsmd. as academic, 282 N.Y. 691.) Candidates other than those from the 146th Assembly District are not before this court, and we cannot pass upon the validity or invalidity of their petitions. The petition of Vaccaro and others from his Assembly District are in substantial compliance with the requirements of section 135 of the Election Law. No fraud had been demonstrated or claimed. There is no opposing slate.


Summaries of

Matter of Vaccaro v. Lawley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 15, 1967
28 A.D.2d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Matter of Vaccaro v. Lawley

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANTHONY VACCARO, Respondent, v. JAMES R. LAWLEY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 15, 1967

Citations

28 A.D.2d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

Lucariello v. Niebel

We agree that, for this reason, the petitions were correctly dismissed as to all respondents except the two…

In the Matter of Cerreto v. Sunderland

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the petition to the extent of determining that the petition…