From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ussach v. Carolee Shops, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 16, 1953
282 App. Div. 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Opinion

October 16, 1953.

Appeal from Workmen's Compensation Board.

Present — Foster, P.J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Imrie, JJ.


In claimant's employment as a store manager it was his usual work to clear the store window in preparation for the window dresser. While doing this work he stooped over to pick up a small display glass and felt pain in his back. "I got a sharp pain" he testified. The condition was diagnosed as a sacroiliac sprain. There is medical proof that it could be caused by bending over. A physician who examined him described the injury as happening when claimant "felt a snap in the low back". It is argued that since an accident must, among other things, be something "catastrophic", that this event was not within the scope of compensation law coverage. What may be catastrophic in a physiological sense need not be a happening of great magnitude or of dramatic force. It is enough if it is a happening, particularized in time and occurrence, and be of magnitude enough to leave adverse physical consequence. No event definable as an accident was found by the court in the record in Matter of Kobinski v. George Weston, Ltd. ( 302 N.Y. 432), not even "any unusual strain" (p. 435). That the claimant here was doing his usual work is no answer to the award if in the usual work an unusual and definable injury occurred. Decision and award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Ussach v. Carolee Shops, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 16, 1953
282 App. Div. 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)
Case details for

Matter of Ussach v. Carolee Shops, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MARTIN USSACH, Respondent, against CAROLEE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 16, 1953

Citations

282 App. Div. 902 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Citing Cases

Matter of Simon v. Columbia Pictures Corp.

The twisting and stretching involved in placing the reel into the projector machine above his head justified…

Matter of Riggio v. Planet Construction Co.

She summoned the family physician who directed claimant's removal to a hospital where it was found that he…