From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Uletas v. Elliott

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 27, 1965
209 N.E.2d 120 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Argued May 18, 1965

Decided May 27, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Allen J. Redlich and Powell Cooper for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Jorge L. Gomez, Paxton Blair and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

No appearance for claimant-respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen's Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, BURKE and SCILEPPI. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim on the dissenting memorandum of Justice HERLIHY in the first appeal to the Appellate Division ( 18 A.D.2d 849). Taking no part: Judge BERGAN.


Summaries of

Matter of Uletas v. Elliott

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 27, 1965
209 N.E.2d 120 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

Matter of Uletas v. Elliott

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of PETER ULETAS, Respondent, v. WILLIAM ELLIOTT…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 27, 1965

Citations

209 N.E.2d 120 (N.Y. 1965)
209 N.E.2d 120
261 N.Y.S.2d 79