From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tyrone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 1991
173 A.D.2d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

May 20, 1991

Appeal from the Family Court, Westchester County (Scancarelli, J.).


Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

On August 9, 1989, members of the Peekskill Police Department were dispatched to Lepore Park in response to a report concerning a man with a gun. After being informed by several bystanders that the perpetrator was entering a car, two officers observed the appellant entering the back seat of a vehicle and leaning forward as if to hide something. The officers proceeded to the vehicle, ordered all occupants to exit and found a handgun on the floor behind the front passenger seat.

En route to the police station, the appellant spontaneously revealed to one of the officers that he had the gun but that he "wasn't going to use it". The presentment agency afforded the appellant timely notice of its intent to introduce this statement at the hearing. It was not until the close of the presentment agency's case that the Law Guardian, for the first time, moved to suppress the statement. The Family Court denied the motion to suppress as untimely.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620; Matter of Jamal V., 159 A.D.2d 507), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the appellant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15). Under the circumstances, it was rational for the court to infer that the appellant had both the ability and intent to exercise dominion and control over the weapon (see, People v Chamblin, 146 A.D.2d 707; People v Davis, 104 A.D.2d 1046, 1047, rearg granted determination adhered to 117 A.D.2d 817). The court also properly denied as untimely the appellant's motion to suppress his statement whereby he admitted possessing the gun (see, Family Ct Act § 332.2; People v Franklin, 127 A.D.2d 685). Kunzeman, J.P., Balletta, Miller and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Tyrone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 1991
173 A.D.2d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Tyrone

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TYRONE C., Also Known as TYRONE L., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 20, 1991

Citations

173 A.D.2d 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
570 N.Y.S.2d 193