From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tuohey v. Malkmes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1985
109 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

March 25, 1985


Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

A review of the record indicates that the findings of the hearing officer, which respondent was permitted to adopt as his own ( see, Matter of Teahan v. Bates, 97 A.D.2d 768, 769; Matter of Glengariff Corp. v. Axelrod, 93 A.D.2d 900, 901), were supported by substantial evidence ( Matter of Silberfarb v. Board of Coop. Educ. Servs., 60 N.Y.2d 979).

Moreover, the sanction of dismissal is not so disproportionate to the offenses committed as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness ( Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222) when it is considered that petitioner's demonstrated misconduct included verbal abuse and threats of violence directed at his supervisor in the presence of other employees.

Finally, we have considered petitioner's contention that the disciplinary hearing did not afford him due process and find it to be lacking in merit. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Tuohey v. Malkmes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 25, 1985
109 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Tuohey v. Malkmes

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DAVID TUOHEY, Petitioner, v. HAROLD MALKMES, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 25, 1985

Citations

109 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)