From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re the Accounting of Tuck

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 17, 1939
23 N.E.2d 535 (N.Y. 1939)

Opinion

Argued September 27, 1939

Decided October 17, 1939

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, FOLEY, S.

John B. Doyle for Henry W. Tuck et al., appellants.

Thomas Witter Chrystie and T. Ludlow Chrystie for Elizabeth Fitzsimmons, as ancillary administratrix, appellant.

John B. Doyle for Henry W. Tuck, respondent, on appeal by Elizabeth Fitzsimmons, as ancillary administratrix.

Windsor B. Putnam and Raymond T. Armbruster for Elenore B. Tuck et al., as trustees, respondents.

George B. Brooks for Nellie W. Tuck, respondent.

Louis A. Marchisio for Carlton W. Tuck, respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs to all parties payable out of the estate. No opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN and RIPPEY, JJ. Taking no part: FINCH, J.


Summaries of

In re the Accounting of Tuck

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 17, 1939
23 N.E.2d 535 (N.Y. 1939)
Case details for

In re the Accounting of Tuck

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Accounting of ELENORE B. TUCK et al., as Trustees…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 17, 1939

Citations

23 N.E.2d 535 (N.Y. 1939)
23 N.E.2d 535

Citing Cases

Matter of White

In Matter of Tuck ( 165 Misc. 346) the court held that where the gift is to a specifically named "wife" or…

Matter of Weinstein

The law is well settled that a gift of income without limitation as to time and without a specific gift of…