From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Troidl v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 16, 1995
212 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 16, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County.


There is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination denying petitioner's application for accidental disability retirement benefits on the ground that petitioner failed to sustain his burden of proving that he is permanently incapacitated from performing his duties as the natural and proximate result of a 1991 accident which occurred while he was working. Although the record contains conflicting medical testimony on the issue of causation, it was for respondent to evaluate this testimony and he was free to accord greater weight to one expert's opinion over another.

Mikoll, J.P., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Troidl v. McCall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 16, 1995
212 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Troidl v. McCall

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KENNETH J. TROIDL, Petitioner, v. H. CARL McCALL, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 16, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
623 N.Y.S.2d 178

Citing Cases

Matter of Sepanara

According to the orthopedic surgeon, both of petitioner's degenerative conditions had been symptomatic prior…

Matter of Demilo-Fytros v. McCall

Based upon these findings, Tucker opined that the May 1989 accident did not cause petitioner to suffer any…