From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Town of Hempstead v. Commr. of St.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 11, 1988
142 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

July 11, 1988


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

On this record we find that the Commissioner's determination was supported by substantial evidence. The petitioner failed to meet its burden of proof by providing concrete and convincing evidence that the establishment of the proposed community residential facility would result in the substantial alteration of the nature and character of the area (see, Mental Hygiene Law § 41.34 [c] [5]; Matter of Talisman Dr. Civic Assn. v. Webb, 138 A.D.2d 610; Matter of Town of Hempstead v. Commissioner of State of N.Y. Off. of Mental Retardation Developmental Disabilities, 131 A.D.2d 681; Matter of Town of Oyster Bay v Office of Mental Retardation Developmental Disabilities, 121 A.D.2d 389).

We have considered the petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Town of Hempstead v. Commr. of St.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 11, 1988
142 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Town of Hempstead v. Commr. of St.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 11, 1988

Citations

142 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)