From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Toplitz

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Nov 1, 1919
109 Misc. 401 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1919)

Opinion

November, 1919.

Goldman Unger, for petitioners.

Milton S. Hoffman, for Florence R. Docter.


The sole beneficiary of the trust estate having died and the power of sale vested in the trustees never having been exercised during his lifetime, has become extinguished, as there is no longer any necessity for the conversion of the real estate to accomplish any particular purpose specified in the will. Gourley v. Campbell, 66 N.Y. 169; Chamberlain v. Taylor, 105 id. 185. The fact that there may be debts existing against this estate is not in itself sufficient to sustain and keep alive the power of sale, for such power cannot be exercised for the payment of debts and obligations. Matter of McComb, 117 N.Y. 378. I will therefore hold that there is no valid, subsisting power of sale contained in this will.

Decreed accordingly.


Summaries of

Matter of Toplitz

Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County
Nov 1, 1919
109 Misc. 401 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1919)
Case details for

Matter of Toplitz

Case Details

Full title:Matter of the Estate of EMMA I. TOPLITZ, Deceased

Court:Surrogate's Court of the City of New York, New York County

Date published: Nov 1, 1919

Citations

109 Misc. 401 (N.Y. Surr. Ct. 1919)
179 N.Y.S. 876