From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Thomas v. Bennett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 13, 2000
271 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

April 13, 2000.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Richard Thomas, Elmira, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Patrick Barnett-Mulligan of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., CREW III, SPAIN, CARPINELLO and MUGGLIN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Following a tier III hearing, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of possessing a weapon after a plexiglass shank was found in his cell during a search. The misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who authored the report and found the weapon constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Williams v. Selsky, 257 A.D.2d 932). With respect to the Hearing Officer's denial of petitioner's request to call as a witness his inmate assistant, we find no error. Although the Hearing Officer failed to provide a written explanation for his denial, the record reveals that the testimony sought from this witness was immaterial to the charge and redundant to petitioner's exculpatory testimony, and we find no basis upon which to set aside the determination (see, 7 NYCRR 254.5 [a]; see also, Matter of Torres v. Goord, 264 A.D.2d 871;Matter of Odom v. Goord, 246 A.D.2d 941).

We also reject petitioner's contention that his eventual removal from the hearing room constituted an abuse of the Hearing Officer's discretion (see, 7 NYCRR 254.6 [b]). Since petitioner's removal was caused by his own protracted unruly conduct and only came after repeated warnings, the decision to remove him was well within the discretionary powers of the Hearing Officer (see,Matter of Dumpson v. McGinnis, 247 A.D.2d 804; Matter of Jones v. Selsky, 223 A.D.2d 990). Likewise, the record fails to support petitioner's allegation that the Hearing Officer was biased against him (see , Matter of Fletcher v. Murphy, 249 A.D.2d 638;Matter of Jones v. Selsky, supra).

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Matter of Thomas v. Bennett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 13, 2000
271 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Thomas v. Bennett

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RICHARD THOMAS, Petitioner, v. FLOYD G. BENNETT, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 13, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
705 N.Y.S.2d 445

Citing Cases

Sowell v. Goord

We affirm. Contrary to petitioner's assertion, the Hearing Officer's decision to remove him from the hearing…

Miller v. Costello

Petitioner next claims that he was inappropriately denied the right to call various witnesses. Although there…