From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of the Three Sofia Bros. Corp.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Nov 17, 1947
190 Misc. 891 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1947)

Opinion

November 17, 1947.

Healy Fusfeld for The Three Sofia Brothers Corp., petitioner.

George Brody for Ellen F. Kuhnel, respondent.


The claim here is that respondent's property was damaged while petitioner was moving furniture on August 30, 1941. The moving was being done pursuant to a contract entered into between the parties on August 12, 1941. The three-year Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prac. Act, § 49, subd. 6) referring to actions to recover damages for injury to property resulting from negligence, does not apply. The claim here arises from an agreement between the parties and not from a violation of a duty imposed by law. (See Busch v. Interborough R.T. Co., 187 N.Y. 388.) The six-year statute as to contract actions (Civ. Prac. Act, § 48) is applicable. Service of the demand for arbitration on August 30, 1947, was therefore timely. ( Pomeranz v. More, 187 Misc. 383.) The motion to stay arbitration is denied.


Summaries of

Matter of the Three Sofia Bros. Corp.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County
Nov 17, 1947
190 Misc. 891 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1947)
Case details for

Matter of the Three Sofia Bros. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of THE THREE SOFIA BROTHERS CORP., for a…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County

Date published: Nov 17, 1947

Citations

190 Misc. 891 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1947)
76 N.Y.S.2d 337

Citing Cases

Greco v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Nevertheless, under New York law, "[i]n computing any specified period of time from a specified event," such…