From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of the Marriage of Swan

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 29, 1986
727 P.2d 177 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

D 8205-69002; CA A29760

Submitted on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court June 3, 1986.

Trial court division of property, not including Social Security benefits, affirmed October 29, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Albin W. Norblad, Judge.

Clint A. Lonergan, Portland, argued the cause for appellant — cross-respondent. With him on the briefs were Howard R. Lonergan and Richard L. Lonergan, Portland.

Leslie M. Roberts, Portland, argued the cause for respondent — cross-appellant. With her on the brief were Lois I. Beran, and Kell, Alterman Runstein, Portland.

Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Warden, and Young, Judges.

Warden, J., vice Gillette, J.


PER CURIAM

Trial court division of property, not including Social Security benefits, affirmed; wife awarded $300 per month from August 31, 1983, as permanent spousal support. Costs to neither party.


This case is on remand from the Supreme Court, which held that "the value of [S]ocial [S]ecurity benefits of either [sic] spouse may not be considered in the division of property." Swan and Swan, 301 Or. 167, 176, 720 P.2d 747 (1986). We now consider the effect of that holding, if any, on the division of property and spousal support in our previous decision.

Swan and Swan, 74 Or. App. 616, 704 P.2d 136, clarified 75 Or. App. 764, 704 P.2d 136(1985).

By excluding Social Security benefits of both spouses, the value of the property awarded to husband is reduced from $249,467 to $199,467, and wife's share is reduced from $238,289 to $209,289. The result is that, whereas husband was originally awarded approximately $11,000 more than wife, she now has an advantage of nearly $10,000. On de novo review, we do not find that result unjust or improper. Miller and Miller, 294 Or. 660, 665, 661 P.2d 1361 (1983). The change in the value of the assets awarded husband and wife involves but two percent of the total value of the assets.

We see no reason to change our award of permanent spousal support in the amount of $300 per month to wife from August 31, 1983.

We affirm the trial court's division of property, except for the inclusion of Social Security benefits, and we award permanent spousal support in the amount of $300 per month from August 31, 1983. No costs to either party.


Summaries of

Matter of the Marriage of Swan

Oregon Court of Appeals
Oct 29, 1986
727 P.2d 177 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Matter of the Marriage of Swan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Marriage of SWAN, Respondent — Cross-Appellant, and…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 29, 1986

Citations

727 P.2d 177 (Or. Ct. App. 1986)
727 P.2d 177