From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of the Claim of Simpson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 30, 2003
301 A.D.2d 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

92278

January 30, 2003.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 3, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Rod Simpson, Buffalo, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Bessie Bazile of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Peters, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Claimant was discharged from his employment as a dish washer/bus boy after he failed to report to work as scheduled despite having been warned that he was close to exceeding the number of absences permitted by the employer's absentee policy. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, reversing the decision of the Administrative Law Judge, ruled that claimant lost his employment under disqualifying circumstances. We affirm. Claimant testified that he called his manager and told him he would be late because he had missed his regular bus. Although the manager told claimant to try to get to work, claimant returned home when he realized that he would not be able to get to work until the last two hours of his shift. Although the Board assessed claimant's credibility differently than the two Administrative Law Judges who previously granted claimant's request for unemployment insurance benefits, it is within the exclusive province of the Board to resolve any credibility issues (see Matter of Lionetti [Newsday, Inc. — Commissioner of Labor], 261 A.D.2d 753; Matter of Elewa [Commissioner of Labor], 249 A.D.2d 618) . Under these circumstances, there is substantial evidence to support the Board's decision that claimant lost his employment due to disqualifying misconduct (see Matter of Foster [South Nassau Communities Hosp. — Hudacs], 192 A.D.2d 1010).

Peters, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of the Claim of Simpson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 30, 2003
301 A.D.2d 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Matter of the Claim of Simpson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ROD SIMPSON, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 30, 2003

Citations

301 A.D.2d 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 756

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Steifvater Real Estate, Inc.

These appeals by Stiefvater ensued. Initially, we find no merit in Stiefvater's contention that the Board…

In re Claim of Oakford

Substantial evidence supports the Board's decision. It is well settled that the failure to return to work on…