From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ten Eyck v. Gaynor

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 21, 1911
94 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1911)

Opinion

Argued February 7, 1911

Decided February 21, 1911

Samuel Strasbourger and Max L. Schallek for appellant.

Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel ( Terence Farley of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., HAIGHT, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ.


Summaries of

Ten Eyck v. Gaynor

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 21, 1911
94 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1911)
Case details for

Ten Eyck v. Gaynor

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of WILLIAM H. TEN EYCK, Appellant, for a…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 21, 1911

Citations

94 N.E. 1099 (N.Y. 1911)
94 N.E. 1099