From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Telfer v. Maher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 2000
270 A.D.2d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted February 7, 2000.

March 30, 2000.

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (McElligott, J.), entered October 21, 1998, which denied his objection to so much of an order of the same court (Fields-Ferraro, H.E.), entered August 6, 1998, as directed him to pay child support arrears in the amount of $2,746.65.

Jane C. Reinhardt, Huntington, N.Y., for appellant.

Robert J. Cimino, County Attorney, Central Islip, N.Y. (Frank Krotschinsky of counsel), for respondent.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., DANIEL W. JOY, THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court properly denied the father's objection to the order of the Hearing Examiner. Contrary to the father's contention, the evidence in the record was insufficient to establish that he was entitled to a $500 limit on the accrual of total unpaid child support arrears (see, Family Ct Act § 413[g]; Matter of Simmons v. Hyland, 235 A.D.2d 67, 71 ; Matter of Beaudoin v. Joseph K., 165 A.D.2d 359 ).

O'BRIEN, J.P., JOY, SULLIVAN, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Telfer v. Maher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 2000
270 A.D.2d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Telfer v. Maher

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SUSAN TELFER, respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER MAHER, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 30, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
705 N.Y.S.2d 286

Citing Cases

Mera v. Rodriguez

Here, the father failed to establish a substantial and unanticipated change in circumstances or diligent job…

In re Alberto Betancourt

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Contrary to the father's contention,…