From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tallman v. Colonial Air Transport, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 29, 1932
182 N.E. 159 (N.Y. 1932)

Summary

In Matter of Tallman v. Colonial Air Transport, Inc., 259 N.Y. 512, 182 N.E. 159, an award of compensation under the New York Act was allowed on facts closely similar to those alleged in the present defense.

Summary of this case from Spelar v. American Overseas Airlines

Opinion

Argued March 15, 1932

Decided March 29, 1932

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

T. Carlyle Jones and Bernard J. Vincent for appellants.

John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( Joseph A. McLaughlin and Isaac Frank of counsel), for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ. Not sitting: KELLOGG, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Tallman v. Colonial Air Transport, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 29, 1932
182 N.E. 159 (N.Y. 1932)

In Matter of Tallman v. Colonial Air Transport, Inc., 259 N.Y. 512, 182 N.E. 159, an award of compensation under the New York Act was allowed on facts closely similar to those alleged in the present defense.

Summary of this case from Spelar v. American Overseas Airlines
Case details for

Matter of Tallman v. Colonial Air Transport, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of EDNA TALLMAN, Respondent, against COLONIAL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 29, 1932

Citations

182 N.E. 159 (N.Y. 1932)
182 N.E. 159

Citing Cases

Spelar v. American Overseas Airlines

Matter of Cameron v. Ellis Construction Co., 252 N.Y. 394, 397, 169 N.E. 622, 623. In Matter of Tallman v.…

Matter of Seely v. Phoenix Transit Co.

The finding of the Board that the employer's principal office and place of business was located within the…