From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Swislocki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 1947
273 App. Div. 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

December 22, 1947.

Present — Peck, P.J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See post, p. 808.]


The power of attorney to plaintiff and the submission to arbitration do not make clear the subject matter of the arbitration, but if, as is otherwise indicated, the subject matter is the distribution of a decedent's estate, it would not constitute an arbitrable controversy. That does not mean that plaintiff's wife might not have a good and collectible claim through estate administration, or otherwise against defendant for funds originating in an estate but presently in a status beyond any stage of estate administration, which claim might be arbitrable, but on the present submission that does not appear to be the case. Order appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Matter of Swislocki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 1947
273 App. Div. 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Matter of Swislocki

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Arbitration between SAMUEL SWISLOCKI, Appellant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1947

Citations

273 App. Div. 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Citing Cases

Tenenbaum v. Melnicke

Moreover, although Matter of Glassman was a recent decision, the rule that affairs of decedents cannot be…

Board of Educ. v. Assoc. Tchrs. of Huntington

rs in their professional capacity. Concerning Special Term's decision and judgment sustaining only in part…