From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sterling Concerned Citizens v.Pell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 1994
204 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 31, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the motions to dismiss are denied, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for proceedings consistent herewith.

At a public hearing held on October 9, 1986, the respondents-respondents, constituting the Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Greenport (hereinafter the Board), issued a negative declaration pursuant to ECL article 8 with respect to Local Laws, 1986, No. 5 of the Incorporated Village of Greenport. The local law provided for the rezoning of a vacant lot owned by the respondent-intervenor, Tidal Properties, Inc., a/k/a Winter Harbor Fisheries (hereinafter Tidal), reclassifying the lot from two family residential (R-2) to water front commercial (W-C). At the same meeting, the Village Board enacted the local law and granted the intervenor's change of zone application. However, for reasons not entirely clear, the Board did not file the local law with the office of the Secretary of State pursuant to Municipal Home Rule Law § 27, until December 1991.

In January 1992 the petitioners brought the instant proceeding challenging the negative declaration, and Local Laws, 1986, No. 5 of the Incorporated Village of Greenport. Both the Board and the intervenor moved to dismiss the petition as time-barred, and the court granted the motions, finding the requirement pursuant to Municipal Home Rule Law § 27 was merely ministerial in nature. We now reverse.

Municipal Home Rule Law § 27 (3) specifically provides as follows: "Notwithstanding the effective date of any local law, a local law shall not become effective before it is filed in the office of the secretary of state" (emphasis supplied). In addition, "a proceeding alleging SEQRA violations in the enactment of legislation must be commenced within four months of the date of the enactment of the ordinance" (Matter of Save the Pine Bush v. City of Albany, 70 N.Y.2d 193, 200; Naftal Assocs. v Town of Brookhaven, 173 A.D.2d 799, 800; Clempner v. Town of Southold, 154 A.D.2d 421, 423).

Applying these principles to the case at bar, we note that pursuant to the clear language of Municipal Home Rule Law § 27 (3), Local Laws, 1986, No. 5 of the Incorporated Village of Greenport was not enacted until December 1991 when it was finally filed with the office of the Secretary of State. Therefore, the instant proceeding was commenced within the four-month period within which "a proceeding alleging SEQRA violations in the enactment of legislation must be commenced" (Matter of Save the Pine Bush v. City of Albany, supra, at 200). Accordingly, the petition should not have been dismissed as time-barred. Ritter, J.P., Copertino, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sterling Concerned Citizens v.Pell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 1994
204 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Sterling Concerned Citizens v.Pell

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of STERLING CONCERNED CITIZENS et al., Appellants, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 31, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 425

Citing Cases

In re Marcus v. Bd. of Tr. of V. of Wesley

Here, contrary to the allegations of the petitioners, the terms of the stipulation did not give Wickes…

Town of Brookhaven v. Durao

This local law was adopted by the Town Board on October 15, 2002, and states that it is effective immediately…