From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Steinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 26, 1963
19 A.D.2d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

September 26, 1963


Order, entered on February 18, 1963, unanimously modified on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, to deny the motion of contestants-respondents insofar as they sought to modify items (a) and (c) of the demand for bill of particulars. Said items of the demand should have been allowed to stand. The order provides that the bill of particulars shall be served following the completion of the examinations before trial; and the contestants should then be able to and be required to state the times when and the places where the acts constituting the alleged fraud and undue influence took place, and also the names of the person or persons alleged to have exercised or practiced the same. (See Matter of Martin, 151 Misc. 93; Matter of Gordon, 6 N.Y.S.2d 569, 570.)

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Steinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 26, 1963
19 A.D.2d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Matter of Steinberg

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of JACOB STEINBERG, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 26, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 788 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Matter of Lester

ision (a) of the second decretal paragraph of the order or, if the examinations have been held, within 15…

Coonradt v. Walco

In the Third Department it is not necessary that a bill of particulars be furnished in response to an…