From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Stein v. Topol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 1, 1926
217 App. Div. 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Opinion

July, 1926.

Appeal from State Industrial Board.


The claimant was entitled to a schedule award of 205 weeks as for the loss of a foot on account of the amputation of his leg below the knee joint, which was made necessary by the accident. The atrophy in the knee above the joint was due to disuse of the leg in turn caused by the amputation. The schedule award for the loss of a foot by amputation is intended to cover all the results of an amputation, such as disuse, and no award based upon an atrophy due to disuse of the leg through loss of the foot can be superadded. All concur. Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Stein v. Topol

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 1, 1926
217 App. Div. 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for

Matter of Stein v. Topol

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JOHN STEIN, Respondent, v. SAM TOPOL and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1926

Citations

217 App. Div. 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Citing Cases

Matter of Roular v. Henry Forge and Tool Company

This loss by atrophy, resulting from amputation and disuse, cannot be superadded to the previous award. (…

Claim of Nycz v. Buffalo Body Corp.

3, ¶¶ o, r, s; Id. § 15, subd. 4-a, as added by Laws of 1924, chap. 500; Matter of Stein v. Topol, 217 App.…