From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Starkweather v. Wing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1997
242 A.D.2d 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 30, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, Erie County, Flaherty, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Wisner, Callahan and Doerr, JJ.


Petitioner's infant is a 14-year-old boy who is completely wheelchair dependent and without the strength to propel a manual wheelchair because of cerebral palsy, spastic quadriplegia and other ailments. He lives with his 60-year-old grandparents, who have a history of back problems, in a mobile home that has been renovated to accommodate his needs. He has no personal care aides and is totally reliant upon his grandparents when not at school. Petitioner presented medical proof establishing that a specially adapted power wheelchair is needed to increase the independence and functional ability of petitioner's infant, especially in emergency situations, and to prevent the development of "learned helplessness". Because respondent did not offer any contrary proof, the determination that a customized power wheelchair is not medically necessary is not supported by substantial evidence (see, Social Services Law § 366-a; Matter of Gartz v. Wing, 236 A.D.2d 890; Matter of Dobson v. Perales, 175 A.D.2d 628). We therefore annul the determination and grant the petition.


Summaries of

Matter of Starkweather v. Wing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1997
242 A.D.2d 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Starkweather v. Wing

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JUSTIN STARKWEATHER, an Infant, by LESLIE KELLY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 961 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 658

Citing Cases

Kindron v. DeBuono

In addition, the therapist and petitioner testified that the family pool is the only pool adequate to meet…