From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Ctr.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 30, 1995
215 A.D.2d 337 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

May 30, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.).


Pursuant to the provisions of article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law, the petitioner sought the appointment of a temporary guardian for Marie H., an elderly indigent woman, a patient at St. Luke's Hospital, who was allegedly impaired. Petitioner made the application for the purpose of involuntarily transferring the respondent to a nursing home. The nisi prius court found that where such a petition seeks the appointment of a temporary guardian to involuntarily transfer the allegedly impaired person (AIP) to another facility and to make major medical decisions without the AIP's consent, an indigent AIP is constitutionally entitled to counsel at public expense pursuant to County Law article 18-B.

The appellant City does not contest on this appeal that the respondent does have the right to assigned counsel by reason of a constitutional mandate. However, we find that the IAS Court erred when, without notice or fact-finding, it adjudged that the City is the entity responsible for the payment of article 81 assigned counsel. The appellant City's first opportunity to address this issue comes upon this appeal, since neither it, nor the respondent, had the opportunity to submit factual arguments on the availability of alternatives to County Law article 18-B panelists to represent respondent (see, City of New York v Stack, 178 A.D.2d 355, lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 753). Since the appellant has been denied notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard, we modify and remand for reconsideration solely as to that issue, with leave to the parties, if so advised, to join the State of New York as a party.

Concur — Ross, J.P., Nardelli, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Ctr.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 30, 1995
215 A.D.2d 337 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT HOSPITAL CENTER, Respondent. MARIE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 30, 1995

Citations

215 A.D.2d 337 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 357

Citing Cases

Hirschfeld v. Horton

The Supreme Court found that at least three of the circumstances which mandate appointment of counsel under…

WARMUS v. HEIT

As for the federal constitutional right to counsel, this right, which originated in the criminal context (…