From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of St. Dominic v. Town of Babylon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 1999
262 A.D.2d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued June 3, 1999

June 14, 1999

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Town of Babylon Zoning Board of Appeals, dated September 30, 1998, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner's application to reconfigure existing space on its property as a child day-care center, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated November 30, 1998, which, inter alia, granted the petition and annulled the determination.

John J. Burke, Jr., Town Attorney, Lindenhurst, N.Y. (Frank J. Alberti of counsel), for appellants.

Farrell Fritz, P.C., Uniondale, N.Y. (Dolores Fredrich and Andrew L. Crabtree of counsel), for respondent.

GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Upon our review of the record, we agree with the Supreme Court that the denial of the petitioner's application was arbitrary and capricious. The proposed day-care center is a permitted accessory use to the principal use of the petitioner's property ( see, Matter of Siegert v. Luney, 111 A.D.2d 854; Matter of Unitarian Universalist Church of Cent. Nassau v. Shorten, 63 Misc.2d 978).

The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Matter of St. Dominic v. Town of Babylon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 1999
262 A.D.2d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of St. Dominic v. Town of Babylon

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SISTERS OF THE ORDER OF ST. DOMINIC, respondent, v. TOWN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 492 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 322

Citing Cases

In re Bolognino v. Zng. Bd. of App. of Huntington

A review of the record presented establishes more than sufficient support within the record of the…