From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Spears v. New York City Tran. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 1999
262 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued May 3, 1999

June 14, 1999

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an uninsured motorist arbitration award, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), entered May 15, 1998, which is in favor of the petitioner Diane Spears and against the New York City Transit Authority in the principal sum of $150,000, and in favor of the petitioner Audrey Wilson and against the New York City Transit Authority in the principal sum of $5,000.

Jones, Jones, Gluck Larkin, New York, N.Y. (Anne O'Connell of counsel), for appellant.

Oliveri Schwartz, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Paul F. Oliveri and David Seth Michaels of counsel), for respondents.

LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, LEO F. McGINITY, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision in the first decretal paragraph thereof awarding the petitioner Diane Spears judgment in the principal sum $150,000, and substituting therefor a provision awarding the petitioner Diane Spears judgment in the principal sum of $10,000; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the petitioners.

The New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter the Transit Authority) is a self-insurer which provides uninsured motorist coverage to its passengers in accordance with Insurance Law § 3420(f)(1). The Transit Authority contends, inter alia, that the Supreme Court erred in confirming an arbitration award to the petitioner Diane Spears which exceeded the $10,000 per person statutory limit of its uninsured motorist coverage that was in effect at the time of the accident. We agree.

It is well settled that an arbitration award may be vacated upon the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his or her authority by making an award in excess of the limits fixed by the insurance policy ( see, Matter of Brijmohan v. State Farm Ins. Co., 92 N.Y.2d 821; Matter of Sagona v. State Farm Ins. Co., 218 A.D.2d 660; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Silver, 225 A.D.2d 690). In this case, the Transit Authority was obligated by Insurance Law § 3420 (former [f][1]) to provide the petitioners with uninsured motorist insurance in the maximum sum of $10,000 per person and $20,000 per accident ( see, Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. [Thom], 70 A.D.2d 158). Accordingly, the arbitrator exceeded his authority by awarding the petitioner Diane Spears damages in the sum of $150,000, and we modify the judgment appealed from to reduce this award to $10,000. We further note that the Transit Authority did not waive this claim by failing to appear at the arbitration hearing, since "[a] limitation on the arbitrator's power 'will not be waived if the party relying on it asserts it * * * in opposition to an application for confirmation' " ( Matter of Brijmohan v. State Farm Ins. Co., supra, at 822, quoting Matter of Silverman [Benmor Coats], 61 N.Y.2d 299, 309).

The Transit Authority's remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

Matter of Spears v. New York City Tran. Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 14, 1999
262 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Spears v. New York City Tran. Auth

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DIANE SPEARS, et al., respondents, v. NEW YORK CITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
692 N.Y.S.2d 100

Citing Cases

Rakower Law, PLLC v. Yusifov

As such, the petitioner may not argue that the respondents waived the issue of arbitrability by participating…

Lam Quan, M.D., P.C. v. GEICO Cas. Co.

"Notably, an arbitration award which goes beyond the underlying policy limits exceeds the limited authority…