From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Spanglet v. Metro System

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 14, 1972
39 A.D.2d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

June 14, 1972


Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Workmen's Compensation Board disallowing his claims on the ground that accidental injury arising out of and in the course of employment had not been established. Claimant, a cab driver, alleged he sustained accidental injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment as the result of minor vehicular collisions which purportedly occurred on June 6, 1969 and December 15, 1968. The board rejected claimant's contentions and disallowed his claims. We find present only questions of fact and credibility and no basis to disturb the board's resolution of these issues (e.g., Matter of Finn v. Merritt, Chapman Scott, 20 A.D.2d 731). The board was not required to accept claimant's testimony ( Matter of Scarpullo v. Alba Barber Shop, 18 A.D.2d 1122) and "The disbelief by the board of an assertion of this kind is not an absence of substantial evidence in support of a negative finding". ( Matter of Rothschild v. Flatbush Jewish Center, 18 A.D.2d 1045.) Accordingly, the board's determination must be affirmed. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P.J., Greenblott, Simons, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Spanglet v. Metro System

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 14, 1972
39 A.D.2d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Matter of Spanglet v. Metro System

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of AARON SPANGLET, Appellant, v. METRO SYSTEM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1972

Citations

39 A.D.2d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Matter of Dickman v. Freskeeto Frozen Foods

We disagree. The Workers' Compensation Board was not required to accept claimant's testimony and the…