From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Spaduccino v. John G. Hayes Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 14, 1918
119 N.E. 1078 (N.Y. 1918)

Opinion

Argued April 26, 1918

Decided May 14, 1918

Barnett Cohen and Frank J. O'Neill for appellants.

Merton E. Lewis, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK and McLAUGHLIN, JJ. Dissenting on opinion of KELLOGG, P.J., below: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO and HOGAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Spaduccino v. John G. Hayes Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 14, 1918
119 N.E. 1078 (N.Y. 1918)
Case details for

Matter of Spaduccino v. John G. Hayes Company

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ANNA SPADUCCINO, Respondent, against JOHN G…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 14, 1918

Citations

119 N.E. 1078 (N.Y. 1918)
119 N.E. 1078

Citing Cases

Ramroop v. Flexo-Craft Printing

n. of City of N.Y. v City of New York, 41 NY2d 205; Matter of Porter v D.A. Collins Constr., 28 AD3d 951;…

Metcalf v. Firth Carpet Co.

The Appellate Division, without opinion, had affirmed the award ( 191 App. Div. 930) and the Court of Appeals…