From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Snider v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 8, 1998
252 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

July 8, 1998

Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., Balio and Fallon, JJ.


Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul a determination, made after a Tier III disciplinary hearing, that he violated several inmate rules. The sole issue raised in the petition is that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence. That issue was not raised in petitioner's brief to this Court and thus is deemed abandoned ( see, Matter of Roe v. Selsky, 250 A.D.2d 935). In any event, the issue lacks merit.

Because the issues raised by petitioner in his brief were not raised on his administrative appeal, petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to them, and this Court has no power to reach them ( see, Matter of Nelson v. Coughlin, 188 A.D.2d 1071, appeal dismissed 81 N.Y.2d 834). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.)


Summaries of

Matter of Snider v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 8, 1998
252 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Matter of Snider v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RAYMOND SNIDER, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1998

Citations

252 A.D.2d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 922

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Cross v. Goord

Respondent concedes that the determination finding that petitioner violated inmate rules 113.20 ( 7 NYCRR…

Carpenter v. Saltone Corp.

For these reasons, we agree with the central argument of the DSS on this appeal, that is, that a Medicaid…