From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Snapperman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 23, 1975
50 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

December 23, 1975


Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 3, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective July 2, 1974 because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant, employed as an assistant buyer, elected to retire early allegedly due to harassment by her supervisor. She was not required to retire when she did and, although she claimed the harassment caused her to have hypertension, she produced no medical evidence regarding her alleged condition. The question whether claimant left her employment for health reasons was a factual one within the province of the board (Matter of Wilensky [Catherwood], 33 A.D.2d 830). A personality clash with one's supervisor does not constitute good cause for leaving one's employment (Matter of Socol [Catherwood], 29 A.D.2d 1020). There was substantial evidence to support the board's decision. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P.J., Sweeney, Koreman, Main and Larkin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Snapperman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 23, 1975
50 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Matter of Snapperman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of TOBY SNAPPERMAN, Appellant. LOUIS L. LEVINE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1975

Citations

50 A.D.2d 1029 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Matter of Wolfbiss

Claimant contends that she left her employment because her employer singled her out and harassed and…

Matter of Sawastynowicz

We find, however, that there is substantial evidence to support the conclusion of the Unemployment Insurance…