From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Smith v. Green-Wood Cemetery

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County
Jan 15, 1940
173 Misc. 215 (N.Y. Misc. 1940)

Opinion

January 15, 1940.

Edmund W. Van Voorhis, for the petitioners.

Anderson, Gasser, Ferris Anderson [ J. Wesley Seward of counsel], for the respondent.


It appears that in 1861 George M. Totten purchased a burying plot in Green-Wood Cemetery and four interments were made in that plot, the last being in 1898, the bodies being those of himself, his wife (the grandparents of the petitioners herein) and those of a daughter and two sons. The plot was inclosed by an iron railing set in stone posts and appropriate headstones were placed upon the graves. One of Mr. Totten's sons was killed in the Civil war, and, although his body was not buried in this plot, a stone in his memory was placed there. The petitioners applied to the cemetery for permission to disinter the remains buried in this plot, and, upon the refusal of their request, this proceeding was commenced. There can be no question about the intention of the purchaser of the plot to procure for himself and the members of his family a final resting place, and I can see no substantial reason why his wishes should not be respected. Moreover, these bodies have been in the plot for many years, one of them for more than seventy-nine years, and it is quite probable that nothing remains of that body and that it has become a part of the soil in which it was interred. The purchaser of the plot took it subject to the rules of the cemetery printed on the face of the deed, one of which provided that no disinterment should be allowed without permission being obtained from the cemetery authorities, and I am of opinion that this contract prevents the removal of the bodies sought by the petitioners. Application denied.


Summaries of

Matter of Smith v. Green-Wood Cemetery

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County
Jan 15, 1940
173 Misc. 215 (N.Y. Misc. 1940)
Case details for

Matter of Smith v. Green-Wood Cemetery

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Petition of BARRETT P. SMITH and MAY S. GILPATRIC…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County

Date published: Jan 15, 1940

Citations

173 Misc. 215 (N.Y. Misc. 1940)
17 N.Y.S.2d 706

Citing Cases

Matter of Currier

That section, insofar as material here, reads as follows: "A person has the right to direct the manner in…

Matter of Currier

Section 2210 of the Penal Law specifically provides that a person has a right to direct the manner in which…