From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Smith v. Capasso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 20, 1994
200 A.D.2d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

January 20, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.).


The petitioner, a defendant in a Kings County criminal case, sought certain police documents pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law. The respondents provided the petitioner with the majority of the documents that he requested, and claimed that the remaining requested documents were either not in their possession or exempt pursuant to Public Officers Law § 87 (2) (g) (iii) and (e) (iv). Respondents provided a sufficiently detailed basis to support these claims of nonpossession and exemption to negate the necessity of an in camera review of the documents (Matter of Fink v. Lefkowitz, 47 N.Y.2d 567; Matter of Miracle Mile Assocs. v Yudelson, 68 A.D.2d 176, 180, lv denied 48 N.Y.2d 706).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Asch, Rubin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Smith v. Capasso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 20, 1994
200 A.D.2d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Smith v. Capasso

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KEVIN SMITH, Appellant, v. LOUIS J. CAPASSO, as Records…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 20, 1994

Citations

200 A.D.2d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
608 N.Y.S.2d 815

Citing Cases

Weisshaus v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.

As such, under FOIL, an agency cannot simply quote the language of an exception without enumerating or…

Weisshaus v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.

As such, under FOIL, an agency cannot simply quote the language of an exception without enumerating or…