From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Simmons v. Popolizio

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 27, 1991
78 N.Y.2d 917 (N.Y. 1991)

Opinion

Argued May 30, 1991

Decided June 27, 1991

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Jacqueline W. Silbermann, J.

Russell Engler, John C. Gray, Jr., David Pieragostini and Tracy Miller for appellant.

Harry Steinberg and Suzanne M. Lynn for respondents.

Stephen Myers for MFY Legal Services, amicus curiae.


Order affirmed, without costs. Assuming without deciding that the article 78 proceeding is timely under CPLR 217, the June 17, 1988 determination sought to be reviewed cannot be said to constitute an abuse of discretion under the circumstances presented by this case.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

Matter of Simmons v. Popolizio

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 27, 1991
78 N.Y.2d 917 (N.Y. 1991)
Case details for

Matter of Simmons v. Popolizio

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TALISHA SIMMONS, Appellant, v. EMANUEL P. POPOLIZIO, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 27, 1991

Citations

78 N.Y.2d 917 (N.Y. 1991)
573 N.Y.S.2d 464
577 N.E.2d 1056

Citing Cases

Matter, Sumpter v. New York City Hsg. Auth

The instant proceeding was commenced on October 27, 1997. Petitioner's commencement of this article 78…

In Matter of Yarbough v. Franco

Because no meaningful judicial review lies from the default itself, we hold that the Authority's denial of…