From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Silva v. Scully

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1990
168 A.D.2d 452 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 3, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (West, J., Benson, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination dated March 18, 1988, was vacated based upon a procedural impropriety by the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, who directed a new hearing pursuant to 7 NYCRR 254.8 (d). Accordingly, the determination under review did not constitute a final order, and is not reviewable. In any event, we note that the Commissioner's direction of a new hearing was within the proper exercise of his discretion.

After the new hearing, the petitioner was again found guilty of "fighting", which determination the Commissioner confirmed on July 6, 1988. Because the petitioner did not commence a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 until on or about December 22, 1988, the Supreme Court properly dismissed it as time barred. Contrary to the petitioner's contentions, there is no basis to apply the tolling provision set forth in CPLR 205 (a). Lawrence, J.P., Kooper, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Silva v. Scully

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 3, 1990
168 A.D.2d 452 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Silva v. Scully

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GILBERTO SILVA, Appellant, v. CHARLES SCULLY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 3, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 452 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 571

Citing Cases

Matter of Ortiz v. Rourke

The contention of petitioner that the rehearing was improper is without merit. The procedural defect in the…