From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Shorwitz v. Caminez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1913
155 App. Div. 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)

Opinion

February, 1913.


Order of the County Court of Kings county reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the authority of Gibbs v. Prindle ( 11 App. Div. 470); Smith v. Cayuga Lake Cement Co. (107 id. 524); Webb v. Parker (130 id. 92), and Kretsch v. Denofrio (137 id. 617). Jenks, P.J., Hirschberg, Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Matter of Shorwitz v. Caminez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1913
155 App. Div. 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Case details for

Matter of Shorwitz v. Caminez

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Supplementary Proceedings; Joseph Shorwitz, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1913

Citations

155 App. Div. 915 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)