From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Shinnecock Hills Golf Club, Inc. v. Nardy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 10, 1984
465 N.E.2d 373 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Decided May 10, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Joseph R. Corso, J.

Timothy S. McCulley for appellants.

Benjamin E. Carter and William Sharp for respondents, precluded.

Douglas R. Penny for intervenors-respondents, precluded.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 97 A.D.2d 849).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE.


Summaries of

Matter of Shinnecock Hills Golf Club, Inc. v. Nardy

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 10, 1984
465 N.E.2d 373 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Matter of Shinnecock Hills Golf Club, Inc. v. Nardy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SHINNECOCK HILLS GOLF CLUB, INC., et al., Respondents, v…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 10, 1984

Citations

465 N.E.2d 373 (N.Y. 1984)
465 N.E.2d 373
476 N.Y.S.2d 834

Citing Cases

Matter of Kingsley v. Bennett

The five requirements for demonstrating unnecessary hardship are set forth in New York City Zoning Resolution…

Matter of Drake v. Zoning Board of Appeals

We affirm. It is well established that to obtain a use variance, the proponent must show (1) unnecessary…