Opinion
February 27, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Saladino, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly sustained the determination under review, which "ha[d] a rational basis and [was] supported by substantial evidence" (Matter of Young v. Board of Appeals, 194 A.D.2d 796, 797, citing Matter of Doyle v. Amster, 79 N.Y.2d 592; Matter of Fuhst v. Foley, 45 N.Y.2d 441; Human Dev. Servs. v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 110 A.D.2d 135, affd 67 N.Y.2d 702; Matter of Brous v. Planning Bd., 191 A.D.2d 553). The fact that the respondent went into executive session "to obtain advice of counsel" does not require vacatur of the subsequent determination (see, Public Officers Law §§ 103, 108; Matter of Young v. Board of Appeals, supra).
We have examined the appellants' remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.