From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sherry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1995
222 A.D.2d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 29, 1995

Appeal from the Surrogate's Court, Suffolk County (Signorelli, S.).


Ordered that the decree is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Surrogate's determination that the voucher and release waiver was predicated upon a binding contract entered into between the appellant, the decedent's spouse, and his estate. The evidence adduced at the trial indicates that the executrix of the estate made an unqualified offer to settle all of the appellant's claims for $10,000 and that she unconditionally accepted that offer. Such an offer and acceptance produces a binding contract (see, Barber-Greene Co. v M.F. Dollard, Jr., Inc., 239 App. Div. 655, affd 267 N.Y. 545; 21 N.Y. Jur 2d, Contracts, § 6).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit. Balletta, J.P., O'Brien, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Sherry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1995
222 A.D.2d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Sherry

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of ARTHUR J. SHERRY, Deceased. CANDICE C…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
636 N.Y.S.2d 354

Citing Cases

Nesbitt v. Penalver

Contrary to the conclusion reached by my colleagues, the exchange of correspondence was sufficient to…

Lehman Brothers, Inc. v. Piper Jaffray Co.

In its answer, Piper admits that it offered to sell, and Lehman accepted Piper's offer to sell, 11…