From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Sherman v. Leonard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 1993
197 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Summary

finding that applicant was medically unqualified because of evidence he had a shoulder susceptible to dislocation upheld as not arbitrary and capricious

Summary of this case from Gallo v. Cnty. of Suffolk

Opinion

October 12, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

In light of the conflicting medical opinions, the respondent's determination to medically disqualify the petitioner from the position of police officer was neither arbitrary nor capricious (see, CPLR 7803; Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 231; Matter of Albury v. New York City Civ. Serv. Commn., 32 A.D.2d 895, affd 27 N.Y.2d 694). In addition, the Supreme Court properly concluded that the respondent did not discriminate against the petitioner (see, Executive Law § 296), since the evidence indicated that the petitioner's condition at the time of his examination rendered his shoulder susceptible to dislocation (cf., Matter of State Div. of Human Rights [Granelle], 70 N.Y.2d 100, 106).

In light of the foregoing, we need not address the petitioner's remaining contentions. Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Eiber and Copertino, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Sherman v. Leonard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 12, 1993
197 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

finding that applicant was medically unqualified because of evidence he had a shoulder susceptible to dislocation upheld as not arbitrary and capricious

Summary of this case from Gallo v. Cnty. of Suffolk
Case details for

Matter of Sherman v. Leonard

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ERNEST D. SHERMAN, Appellant, v. ADELE LEONARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 12, 1993

Citations

197 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 652

Citing Cases

Vespucci v. Prendergast

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents. The Supreme Court properly concluded that the…

Matter of Duchinsky v. Scoppetta

, courts will not interfere with the discretion of the appointing officer unless the action complained of was…